Today in the United States, we are having our federal elections. The Presidency is (sadly) not up for a vote this year, but 35 seats in the US Senate and all 436 seats in the House of Representatives are. So for... reasons, I am opting to re-run my review of The Day the Klan Came to Town today.

---

I think there are a number of prevalent myths surrounding the Ku Klux Klan. I think a lot of people believe that they limited their activities to the Southern US. I think a lot of people believe the only group of people they acted on was the Black population. I think some people believe stories about the Klan killing people pretty indiscriminately are overblown. I think some people STILL believe the Klan to be a benevolent, civic organization comprised of "many fine people."

All of those beliefs are bullshit. The Day the Klan Came to Town rips up every one.

Back in 1923, the KKK held a 30,000 person rally in Carnegie, PA for the express purpose of slaughtering the minorities that largely populated the area. (The total population of Carnegie at the time was around 11,500.) Blacks, Italians, Hispanics, Jews, Irish... pretty much anyone not deeemed sufficiently Ayrian was fair game. The Klan had police members on their side who steadfastly refused to protect the citizens of Carnegie, directly opposing the orders the local Burgess. The town's various ethnic groups banded together to try to halt the Klan's march through town, but that quickly led to a full-scale attack. Several people were injured, and it only ended once one of the Klansmen was killed and the group retreated.

That's the story that's told here. It focuses primarily on Primo Salerno, an Italian immigrant who fled to the United States after having been conscripted by the Italian governmnt to fight in WWI. His wife, Gianna, came over some time later (as we learn through some flashbacks) and at the time of the main story, she is heavily pregnant with Primo's child. Because of his time in the war, Primo is reluctant to fight but he readily understands the stakes involved and doesn't hesitate to join forces with the others. But while Primo and the other men of the town gather in the streets, the women move to the rooftops. Including Gianna and the elderly Irish woman, Marta, who's helping to look after her. They mostly fight with clubs and bricks, but once Primo fires a dropped pistol to help his friend Marcu, the Klan flee in fear. And while Marcu rejoices in what others will remember they managed to accomplish, another reminds him that "Americans love forgetting." The book closes with a single image of a contemporary "ethnic" woman, handcuffed, in an ICE cage noting that she was actually born here.

Writer Bill Campbell is upfront with the fact this account has been fictionalized. It to be because there are so few contemporaneous accounts of what actually happened that weren't expressly from the KKK's perspective. But the rally and subsequent attack on the "Irish and others" happened, and was soon swept under the rug as KKK-sympathizers skimmed over details that made them look bad. Which is to say, they skimmed over virtually everything. Campbell also notes that he actually grew up in Carnegie and never learned of any of this until many years later. That makes telling the story now even more important, to ensure everyone knows just how awful and racist shitbags Klan members are.

Artist Bizhan Khodabandeh does a good job with the storytelling, and ensuring characters are distinct and identifiable even among larger groups and even minor characters that have little, if any, dialogue. The drawings aren't overly detailed and tend to fall on the more cartoonish side, but I don't know that's an issue. In fact, having the more simplified figures probably helps for readers to identify with the characters.

The echoes between the events in this book and today are impossible to miss. I haven't checked, but I think Campbell even swiped some dialogue from people talking about the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville where Heather Heyer was deliberately run over and murdered. This is the history we're never taught in school. (Campbell calls what we are taught "American fanfic" -- a term I am totally going to use myself in the future!) And that we're never taught this is why so many bullshit myths get generated. It's only by confronting our own history honestly and directly that we even have a hope of overcoming its ongoing legacy.

I was actually surprised yesterday in going through some comics that a few newspaper strips -- historically ones that are famously apolitical -- used concern about this year's US elections as a topic. It was a Sunday after all, two whole days before the election, and most strips will save topical subjects for the day of an event, unless they're able to make some week-long story about it. So I thought, "OK, if several newspaper cartoonists are talking politics, then tomorrow I can start running them as a collection on my blog summarizing where their collective head is at regarding this election."

And when I got up and started checking the comics early this morning to start collecting them, I got... well, not exactly nothing but not a whole heck of a lot. And most of what I did see was more evergreen political discussion like references to the number of political ads we're bombarded with or how mainstream media is talking exclusively about politics instead of something sophomoric like celebrity gossip. So the idea for my planned blog this morning kind went up in smoke.

Here are this week's links to what I've had published recently...

Kleefeld on Comics: Pizzazz!
https://ift.tt/elaKMrJ

Kleefeld on Comics: Javins = Shooter ?
https://ift.tt/j8dLyqt

Kleefeld on Comics: Marketing Terminology
https://ift.tt/s3HRakz

Kleefeld on Comics: Whither Zombies?
https://ift.tt/swVD5rZ

Kleefeld on Comics: Old Tom Fagan Interview
https://ift.tt/lLHC6pP

Since we're on the cusp of Halloween, I thought I'd run a piece on Tom Fagan, comic fan extraordinaire and founder of the Rutland Halloween Festival. This is a 2007 interview that ran in the Rutland Herald and, since it seems to have since fallen off the internet, is why I'm posting it here. It's more about his interest in Halloween than his work in comics fandom, but still touches on that as well. The interview was conducted by Sarah Hinckley...

Tom Fagan, 75, could be called a star among superheroes, a fan of phantoms or a heathen of Hallows Eve, but for many years most called him Mr. Halloween.

"I think if I pass over around Halloween time, I'll be riding in a casket in the parade," said Fagan outside his ghoulishly decorated room at the Loretto Home. "I'd be all for that, too."

It was Fagan's love of the October holiday that made the Rutland Halloween Parade into one of the most coveted costumed carnivals in the country. A couple from England is scheduling a visit to Vermont just to see the parade, according to one Shrewsbury inn owner.

Legendary tales of comic book characters caravanning past the marble and brick edifices of downtown were born from Fagan's passionate pen. Annually he would write a letter to [DC Comics*], creators of Batman and the like, but it was the first that got the ball rolling.

"They printed that letter and that really kicked things off," said Fagan. "I was getting letters from all over the country. Each time they printed it we would get more people and more people."

Not only did his letters draw comic book character enthusiasts to the Vermont city, it also got Fagan and the parade featured in a number of strips. In 1972, [DC Comics'] Justice League of America, made up of Batman, Superman, The Flash, Green Lantern and Phantom Stranger, featured the group battling a demon incursion at the parade in Rutland.

Fagan's inspiration came from the first Rutland parade he watched with his daughter, in which William Ciofreddi, son of John Ciofreddi, then superintendent of the Rutland Recreation and Parks Department, dressed in a comic book costume. "I maintain that he has to be the first comic book character," said Fagan about the start of the theatrical theme.

According to Fagan that first parade consisted of a couple of high school bands and an assortment of costumed children. But the man who had grown up loving Halloween wanted more and approached the elder Ciofreddi after the parade.

"That was good, John," Fagan remembers telling him, "but it could be better." So, Ciofreddi handed the ball over to Fagan, appointing him parade general chairman. Fagan recollects the theme of the 1960 Rutland Halloween Parade was "Creatures in the Night."

"You could come as you wanted," said Fagan. "The parade was very well received. That was supposed to be the night that people could be who they secretly wished to be."

As it grew, there were floats from comic book companies such as [DC Comics], Marvel Comics, Comic Crusader. Even Madd [sic] magazine had representation. Fagan recalls at one point there being as many as 181 different comic characters represented at the parade and celebration.

"You'd be going down the street and you'd see Aunt Jemima standing next to Ronald Reagan," he said.

Not only were the characters coming to town, but those within the comic book industry who penned their fates also joined the fun. Writers and artists arrived in Rutland for the parade and an adjoining party thrown largely in their honor for a number of years.

"All sorts of great things happened," said Fagan. "We kept building it up and building it up. I don't know how many bands at one time… You had bands that were nothing but Batman… All I know is that the parade grew and grew and grew. I certainly hope it will continue for a long, long time."

Fagan was given a seat in the judge's station at last year's parade. More than 10,000 people attended the event last year; a record number of floats have registered this year.

"I was just amazed at the crowd last time," said Fagan, who has yet to miss the Rutland Halloween Parade. "I've always seen 'em one way or another."

With less than a week to go before another cast of characters parades through the streets of downtown, Fagan watched a classic horror film in his room. Bats hung from the ceiling, a wolf posed to howl at the full moon perched upon a table. Other colorful decorations seem to scream out that this man is haunted with a love for Halloween.

"I've been collecting decorations since grammar school," said Fagan. "I used to leave them up (longer than the holiday), much to the consternation of many."

Fagan, hunched with age, wore a pair of black jeans and an orange T-shirt with the words, "Sleep all day, Party all night," framing a human outline sporting batwings.

Fagan's love for the holiday goes back to when he was two or three years old. He had attended a big Halloween party at the Colony House in Rutland for children of low-income families, according to Fagan.

"I even got permission to stay up until midnight because that's when the witch was going to fly across the face of the moon," he said. "I love it when it's close to full-moon time."

He slept through the witch's journey that night and remembers being upset.

When asked if that child's curiosity has ever been quenched, Fagan replied, "Out of the corner of my eye I've seen her fly."

* Hinckley repeatedly refers to DC Comics throughout the piece as "Detective Comics." I suspect this was a misunderstanding on her part; the letters "DC" do indeed come from the name "Detective Comics" but the company hasn't actually been called that since 1939. I've replaced all instances here with the company's formal name of "DC Comics."

I'm sure you've heard it said thart art is a reflection of life. Art isn't creating in a vacuum; it's created by an artist (or artists) in the context of their society and, thus, both speaks and is responding to that society. Nuclear war was on everyone's minds back in the 1980s, which is why there was such a proliferation of post-apocalypse stories for example.

Within the horror genre specifically, the types of horror stories being told and the types of monsters that appear in stories reflect the fears of the times. Mary Shelly's original Frankenstein novel reflects concerns people were starting to have about science outpacing man's ethos, and the notion of using science to "defy" nature. Vampires have been notably mutable over the generations, reflecting whatever elements of sexuality and gender that are concerning people at the time. (Part of why vampires are frequently shown as eternally youthful -- it's the younger generations that are more often seen as being "in danger" of committing waton sexual behavior.)

While the concept of zombies has been around for ages, they started gaining popularity back in the 1970s and began really taking off in the late '90s and early 2000s. In particular, the notion of the zombie apocalypse where the individual zombies were less of a threat than the sheer overwhemling volume of them. This can be read as a reaction to the notion of societal changes happening at an increasingly faster and faster pace (I've written about the notion of "future shock" more than a few times here) and it becoming more and more difficult to keep up. I once saw someone make the analogy specifically to email; that you take care of one email and there's another behind it, and another, and another, and another... and you set up more spam filters but they keep coming... and you keep trying to get to Inbox Zero, but the moment you do another shows up... and heaven forbid, you take your eyes off it for too long -- you'd be just overwhelmed!

You can also read zombies as a fear of losing your individuality and just becoming another mindless consumer, buying whatever the latest doohickey is because some corporation's ad told you to. Within comics specifically, the notion of being a "Marvel zombie" meant that you simply bought every Marvel title by default without giving thought to who the creators were or what the comic was about. (That specific concept has rather died out, I think, mostly by the financial impracticability of buying every Marvel title! I just scanned through the November previews, and it'd cost you over $50 to buy just the #1 issues coming out!)

With all that said, though, I'm not seeing a whole lot with zombies this year. Personally, I've seen none at all in people's Halloween decorations in my neighborhood. There don't seem to be too many comic titles around with zombies in them. (Not "none" certainly, but not a lot, it seems to me.) And you could argue that The Walking Dead's popularity cycle has gone on long enough that might deplete people's interest, it seems that the concept of zombies is a perfect metaphor for the AI slop we're seeing everywhere these days. Content that's human-shaped but lacking any soul. Something made from the vestiges of human ingenuity but not inherently creative itself. Something mindless that comes at you through your screen, and every time you click it away, there's another that pops out in a virtual jump scare. I should think the notion of fighting through an army of zombies a perfect analogy for trying to sort through the non-stop barrage of AI slop coming through our monitors.

But I don't see that anywhere currently.

Maybe it's just me. I've never been partial to the zombie concept to begin with, and maybe I've self-selected out of those avenues so much over the years that it just never hits my radar any more. But with Halloween right here, and seemingly everybody talking about spooky season and such, I would think the idea would at least show up a little for me.

Then again, I've never exactly been on the cutting edge of trends, and I've never quite understood how any given thing becomes popular in the first place, so what do I know?

Like any industry, comics has its own lingo. Language that is used pretty exclusively for comics, or at least have their own definitions unique to comics. Gutters, word balloons, TPBs, etc. Sometimes industries overlap, though, and marketing industry language gets used when talking about marketing comic books. As I happen to work in marketing, I thought I might take a blog post to make sure we're all speaking the same language when it comes to that.

What are, for example, POP Displays? "POP" is an acronym for "point of purchase." It's a general term used to describe any promotional material that's designed to be placed at the location where you actually buy something. It could be a sticker meant to actually be adhered to the cash register or a poster intended to hang behind the counter or an old-school spinner rack that's displaying comics or even a life-size figure. Sometimes they're made by the publisher, sometimes the retailer. Really, it's just about anything that a retailers utilize as a way to promote their products.

"POS" stands for "point of sale" and is a sub-set of POP. The point of sale is where the actual transaction takes place, where the cash register is. These are typically smaller items, and try to play more heavily on the impulse purchase mentality, whereas POP can be (but not necessarily always are) larger and geared more towards overall awareness.

There are some standards that often get thought of with regard to POP. The "tent card" is a classic because they're easy to create and can be tweaked to fit a wide variety of sizes and proportions. It's essentially just piece of heavy paper folded in half. The V shape is placed upside down on the counter, allowing the text and graphics to be seen/read while the customer is standing near it. Because there's so little involved in the actual production of tent cards, creators not infrequently provide PDFs for retailers to print out themselves.

"Table tents" are essentially a more elaborate version of tent cards. Unlike their namesake, table tents do not necessarily fold up in a tent-like shape but, rather can be nearly any sort of self-standing piece designed to be placed on a table or counter. You see this type of thing a lot in mid-scale restaurants. Sometimes they're just cardboard standups plugging the desserts, sometimes they're more elaborate and hold copies of the menu or napkins. (Though don't confuse table tents with napkin holders; there needs to be a marketing/sales angle here.) Those cardboard cut-outs of characters you sometimes see on comic convention tables with the speech balloon hawking the latest book? Those are table tents.

Another simple, and common, POP for comics are "header cards." These are basically a flat piece of card stock that's as wide as, but an inch or two taller than, a comic book. They're designed to be placed behind a stack of comics on the rack, and the portion that sticks up above the actual comic has some type of promotional message. I've seen store-specific ones frequently that highlight staff picks, while publisher ones use them to tie together storylines that cross over multiple titles.

Also used right next to the comics are "shelf talkers." These are also generally simple card stock pieces, but they rest underneath a stack of comics and stick out slightly beyond the shelf. Publishers again can create title-specific shelf talkers, but many stores also use them to highlight "New Comics This Week" or "Featured" books as seen in this photo.

Less used, because they're a tad more expensive in large quantities, are "window clings." These are thin plastic, usually translucent, promotional pieces that adhere to smooth surfaces like windows via static electricity. I have to admit that I haven't seen these used much in comicdom; the only instance I can think of offhand are the Visa/Mastercard pieces often stuck on the front door.

From time to time, "standees" are available. These basically large cardboard cutouts that are free-standing. You tend not to see too many of them in comic shops since they take up a fair amount of precious floor space. They also are fairly expensive for as quickly as they begin to look worn. Some of the more popular characters have commercially available versions for fans. I recall there was an Arthur Adams drawn Wolverine that was rather prolific in the 1980s.

That's certainly not all of the POP items that are available, but that covers some of the more common ones that use terms you might not be familiar with. Check out the promotional kit below and see how many different POP pieces you can identify!

I've been running behind on a number of things lately and just had a chance to read Rob Salkowitz's piece talking with Joshua Williamson at New York Comic Con from a week and change ago. It's a good read overall, but let me quote a portion I want to focus on...

DC has, at times, been prone to playing too heavily into that, manufacturing crises and continuity events that landed with diminishing returns, exhausting existing fans without bringing in new ones.

These days it is doing the opposite of that. The lineup is bristling with new takes on old characters that offer onramps for fans with varied tastes and sensibilities...

Williamson credits a lot of that to the culture created by editor-in-chief Marie Javins. "Everyone likes her total leadership," said Williamson. "She has a lot of trust in us. I think that's because she was also a creator, a colorist. She has this experience and understands it from that perspective, not just a business perspective."

Williamson says that under Javins, creators have a lot of freedom to take books in their own direction, almost as if they were creator-owned.

That, to me, sounds remarkably like, Jim Shooter's early days at Marvel. Jim Shooter had been a writer for (primarily) DC starting back in 1966. He got to be editor-in-chief at Marvel in 1978, and soon helped to usher in the legendary runs of Chris Claremont and John Byrne's Uncanny X-Men, Frank Miller's Daredevil, Walt Simonson's Thor, John Byrne's Fantastic Four, and Doug Moench and Bill Sienkiewicz's Moon Knight among others. And if you read/hear interviews with any of those creators talking about that era, they all say that they had a lot of latitude to do what they wanted. They took the characters in then-new directions based on the creators' visions, almost as if they owned them outright.

Shooter has since gotten a bad rap for his later levels of editorial interference, and sliding his focus more to the business end of the company to the detriment of the creative end. (I recall Byrne citing that he had been working on Fantastic Four about 3 months ahead of his deadlines, but then Shooter changed the deadlines and he became six months behind overnight.) I knew a retailer who made a very clear distinction between "Early Shooter" era Marvel and "Late Shooter" era Marvel with the split being 1984 with the Shooter-scripted Marvel Super Heroes Secret Wars. Because Late Shooter era Marvel seems to have less creative (as generally perceived) output, more complaints from creators, and even several creators (notably Byrne, Moench, Steve Gerber, Marv Wolfman, and Gene Colan) having left to work for DC, Shooter's reputation with Marvel isn't great. But his first years there were qualitatively and quantitatively excellent.

For pretty much the exact reasons Williamsons attributes to Javins.

I suspect that if you look any of the collectively great periods of a comic publisher's content, you'll find not only some incredibly talented creators (which seems obvious) but also an editor-in-chief who trusted that talent in the same way. Bill Gaines' "new trend" EC comics. Early '60s Marvel under Stan Lee. Like Shooter, their work isn't devoid of controversy but there was some amazing creative output that came out of those periods. Creative output that directly led to higher sales.

Funny that has to be learned over and over and over again.