One of the news items over the weekend was that Comix Wellspring -- a popular printer among independent creators and publishers for several years -- has suddenly shut down. Temporarily. Maybe. A message on the company's home page says, "We sincerely apologize, but due to unforeseen operational challenges, Comix Wellspring, owned and operated by Carta Finishing, must temporarily suspend accepting new orders and halt production at this time." They don't offer any further explanation, only to go on to suggest alternative options for customers. So what's going on? Do they offer any clues?

Well, the first thing they say after that opening statement is that any currently incomplete orders will be fully refunded. Which means that they're not having money problems, because they've got the cash on-hand to offer that. If there were debt issues or somethng, any incoming money from the past several months would've gone immediately to pay off whatever debts had already accumulated and they wouldn't be able to make refunds immediately and unconditionally.

They also suggest another printer, Greko Printing, for any future projects. While suggesting an alternative route seems straight-forward enough, Greko Printing was founded by one of the founders of Comix Wellspring and when he left to do so, he signed a non-compete agreement saying he would not print comic books. Non-competes are a fairly standard (if somewhat dubious) practice in those types of situations and that Comix Wellspring went out of their way to negate the existing agreement for the sake of its customers says that this shut down is not going to be short-lived. I'd go so far as to say that it suggests they don't expect to be back in operation ever.

The "unforeseen" part of their "unforeseen operational challenges" seems significant. The company launched a completely overhaulded version of their site for placing orders and such just two months ago; that's not a change they'd undertake if they knew they'd be shutting down soon. Indeed, they had been touting the upgrade for months and just before launching it, they posted a message that said, "THIS is the next era of Comix Wellspring." They were very much planning for the future, and trying to offer more capabilities and services to their customers.

I'm wondering if there's something higher up the chain. The announcement refers to being owned by Carta Finishing. Carta is a relatively new company, coming together in late 2023 when Gatherall Bindery and Allied Bindery merged. Comix Wellspring was wrapped in around the same time. Dan Hills (pictured at right) was promoted up to the CEO role from CMO in March 2024; however, interestingly, his LinkedIn profile includes an end date as CEO -- and with Comix Wellspring entirely -- of June 2026.

So is Hills' departure the cause of this shut-down? Nominally, yes, it would seem so. But I think there's more to it than, "we can't run our day-to-day operations without a CEO." Hills attended the ComicsPRO meeting back about four months ago, and his posts seemed excited about it. The last full interview I can find with him dates to November, and he seemed pretty excited about comics and the company then as well. So it doesn't seem to me like he was feeling burnt out -- although that could indeed be hidden relativey easily online. And besides, if that were the extent of the issue (although, to be clear, burn-out is not a small issue for the individual; I'm talking about this relative to Comix Wellspring as a whole shutting down) Carta Finishing could appoint an interim CEO either from within Comix Wellspring itself or from Carta just to make sure things keep rolling. Because a full shut-down, even if it is only temporary, is an extremely drastic step for a company, and not one that would be undertaken casually. Indeed, as Chief Operating Officer, Brian Thomas could keep the presses running in the short term with no problem; even though he was only promoted to that position in February, he's got a decades long professional history in leadership roles just like that.

This, to me, points to a larger issue. I don't have any evidence of what went on here, but frequently when a CEO steps away like that, it's because of a significant conflict with the parent company. That the larger company made some decision(s) the CEO fundamentally disagreed with, fought against, and ultimately got over-ruled on. Leading to the CEO resigning (or being forced out) in protest. In the past, I've most often seen this when the larger company tries to fully absorb the smaller one causing it to shut down or when they plan to make some significant layoffs to reduce "redundant" operations. (Think along the lines of, "Why do we need two HR departments?") So the sudden shut-down of Comix Wellspring could be a response to Hills' departure where Carta might say, "Well, if there's no CEO anyway, let's just accelerate our schedule to absorb the whole company rather than try to waste time to put a new CEO in place just for a few months or a year."

Like I said, I don't have any hard evidence of what went/is going on. But Hills' sudden -- and quiet -- departure almost immediately before this current shut-down took place strongly suggests to me something like the above. (The notion of Carta absorbing the company fully is 100% speculative, just based on what I've seen historically. It could also be something like Carta trying to force Comix Wellspring to print pro-Nazi comics that Hills personally objected to on ethical grounds. That type of thing does happen, but it's pretty rare in my experience.) The only other thing I can think of would be if there were some massive legal problems with Hills personally (like, at a felony level) but I suspect that we would've heard news of that already separately, and that wouldn't so significantly impact Comix Wellspring's day-to-day operations. With the company having halted all operations already, and the CEO already departed, I suspect we won't hear much else formally though. Maybe Hills or Thomas will drop a tell-all blog post about it a couple years from now, but I think most people will have forgotten all about it by then.

In the meantime, my best wishes to whoever's left at Comix Wellspring. I don't doubt things feel extremly unstable and chaotic for you, and I hope you're able to land on your feet.

Here are this week's links to what I've had published recently...

Kleefeld on Comics: Tom Hanks Is an OG FF Fan
https://ift.tt/NsZJgB2

Kleefeld on Comics: The Fantastic Four's Chest Emblem
https://ift.tt/K5wmqv3

Kleefeld on Comics: Nap Time
https://ift.tt/mOGk7Jn

Kleefeld on Comics: Political Speech Now Illegal
https://ift.tt/RAjGYtC

Kleefeld on Comics: Steranko Histories
https://ift.tt/cbtCFwm

Even if you haven't read them, you've probably at least heard of Jim Steranko's History of Comics. It was one of the first serious attempts to write down the entire history of the medium, and certainly the first from someone already in the business. Steranko's position as a respected professional allowed him access to a number of creators who had worked during the Golden Age of comics. The covers of the two completed issues are rather famous in and of themselves for depicting a fairly wide range of characters from several publishers.

Less well known is that there are actually four different covers between the two issues... As you can see, two of the covers feature no text at all, while the others sport the title prominently across the top. The interiors are unchanged, so you might call these variant covers. (Though they certainly weren't called that at the time.)

Although I've seen the titled versions labeled as "1A" and "2A", I believe that to be incorrect. "Misleading" might be a better word. When I had Steranko sign my (logo-less) copies, he noted that the wordless versions were a little more rare because he initially had underestimated demand. The implication being that they came out first, with the titled version being done as a later iteration. I've seen notes from others who got them when they were first published also say that the wordless versions came out first with the titled copies being, in effect, second printings. This is further backed up by the logo-less versions frequently commanding a higher price. (Although, to be fair, a higher price doesn't necessarily mean greater rarity, just greater demand relative to supply. It's possible that fans just like the wordless version better because there's nothing disrupting the illustrations.)

Further, if you look at the layouts, the illustrations are lowered on the page to accomodate the title. In doing so, several of the characters are uncomfortably cut off -- most notably Joker on #1; and Thing, Hulk, and Hawkman on #2. Not only does it seem unlikely that Steranko would add all of the extra figure work on the logo-less copies, but if he drew the illustration with a title in mind, why would he have placed those figures so low on the page that they might be chopped in half? From a design perspective, it makes more sense that the titled versions came later.

If you are trying to track down copies of these, you should be buying them for the content. I found them surprisingly dryly written, though they are incredibly informative. Even today, with literally hundreds of history books written about comics, they still have a great deal to offer. But if, in tracking these down, you find yourself wondering why there are some copies with a title and some without and what the difference is, it boils down to whether you're looking at a first or second printing, although it won't say that on the interior anywhere.

Go read this news piece that The Beat posted yesterday...

Zines used as evidence to convict in Prairieland case

I mostly just want bring more attention to this matter, so I don't have a lot to add. The first thing I'll note, though, is that there is by definition no such thing as an "antifa cell." Anitfa is not a group of any sort; it's just anyone who is against facism. That's it. Literally by definition. Anti-Facism. Anti-Fa. And I will also say: the article concludes with the quote, “The slippery slope from anarchist zines to conventional journalism isn’t hypothetical, and we’re already sliding fast.” I would argue that we've already slid.

Today's Andy Capp...

A more or less standard type of gag for the strip. Very much into character with Andy being lazy on the couch, and Flo offerring snide commentary. What occurs to me, though, is that Andy always sleeps on the couch that way. Kind of curled up a bit, with his head facing into the couch. He doesn't sleep on his back or facing out away from the couch.

That's actually pretty much par for the course with comic strip characters. Here's Blondie from Saturday...

La Cucaracha from a week ago...

The "classic" depiction of comic strip napping is: kind of curled up a bit, facing into the couch.

You ever try to actually nap that way? Personally, I find it one of the least comfortable ways to sleep on a couch. I'm sure some people find it more comfortable than others, and the level of comfort surely depends a great deal on the specific couch you're talking about too. But why that pose? Why not any of the dozens of other ways you can nap on a couch?

Well, for starters, not every time someone is depicted napping is shown in this way. Sometimes they're sitting upright with their head tilted forward. Sometimes, they're just kind of sprawled over the entire couch. It depends on the situation and, more to the point, to showcase WHY the character is napping.

If you're sitting upright on the couch with your head tilted forward while you sleep, you got that way because you sat down to read or watch TV or something and just nodded off. Perhaps a bit of exhaustion, perhaps a bit of your body forcing itself to relax. But generally, it's not your intention to fall asleep. And that sprawled out pose? That is just pure exhaustion. You collapsed on the couch, and your entire body shut down without regard to how comfortable you are.

But curled up, facing the couch? That's intentional. That's a pose that says, "I am deliberately trying to shut out the world." The Blondie strip above specifically speaks to that idea; Dagwood is NOT asleep, but he's actively trying to ignore the children. He's literally turned his back to them, and even if he opens his eyes, his field of vision would entirely consist of the back of the couch. He's curled up to make himself as physically inaccessible as possible. Andy and Ernesto above are also both not entirely asleep as Andy is talking with Flo and Ernesto is consciously considering what is going on in his subconscious. In none of these strips are the characters successful in shutting out the world, but that IS their intent.

I can't point to exactly when this became the default pose for comic strip naps. Doing a fairly quick search, I've managed to find a Blondie strip dating back to 1944 showing Dagwood on exactly that same couch, though...

I think it's a safe bet that this isn't the first time Chic Young used that visual structure; he's very clearly already comfortable drawing it here. So I'm sure there are earlier Blondie examples if nowhere else. Regardless of who started that trope, though, there is a solid reason for it. And there's a solid reason it continues to get used a century later. That single pose immediately tells the reader not only that a character is napping, but also WHY they're napping.

Speaking, as I was yesterday, about the 1960s Fantastic Four, there has been, for many years, a big debate on how much Stan Lee contributed to the early Marvel output versus Jack Kirby. Some say Lee did the bulk of the work and Jack was just a hired hand to illustrate Lee's vision; others think Kirby did everything and Lee was nothing more than a glorified proofreader. The truth likely lies in between somewhere, although it is pretty readily accepted by everyone that Kirby did all the artwork and design.

Except when he didn't.

One of the pages of original art that has survived is page 16 from Fantastic Four #3. The Thing and the Human Torch get into a fight, and the Torch leaves. More interestingly, though, we have on the back of the art board several sketches for a chest emblem. The was the issue where the FF debuted their team uniform and it would appear that there was some discussion about what the chest emblem should be. And what we can see with this page in particular was that Kirby was not the only one making illustrative contributions to the book.

The logo sketches were most likely Lee's work. Some of the other earlier FF pages indeed have rough (i.e. really bad stick figures) "layouts" that are Lee scribbled to help describe what he was envisioning to Kirby. It's possible that someone besides Lee could have done these emblem sketches, but A) it almost certainly wasn't Kirby -- those bear no resemblance to his style of sketching -- and B) not many other people would've had access to the original art.

Now, the other possibility for the logos could be Sol Brodsky. He appears to have done some elaborate re-work on the Human Torch figures throughout that issue, including on that page (at right, circled in red) to bring him more in line with the original Carl Burgos design. So Brodsky would have had access to the art boards, and he did create the "Fantastic Four" logo that shows up on the cover. That said, I'm inclined to say it was still Lee as Brodsky had a fair degree of artisic skill and most of the designs seem to have been drawn by someone with an unsure hand.

But then there's the question of the sketches showing up on page 16 instead of 7, when the costume first appears. That doesn't strike me as particularly odd. Kirby wouldn't have only turned in one or two pages at a time, he turned the art for an entire story at once. So when Lee (or Brodsky) opted to doodle some new logo ideas, he could've grabbed any page from the story at random. Brodsky, already going through the pages to re-work the Torch, would have also been able make other adjustments to the characters' costumes as the same time.

In Pure Images #2, Greg Theakston goes back to the original art and inked some of the pages onto new boards using some of Jack's original pencil lines. Jack's original FF logo was an interlocking "FF" similar to one of the middle ones on the far right of that page. (Circled in red at the left. The final is circled in blue.) Further, the costumes included masks for everyone, hence that really weird close-up on Sue's face when she first steps out in the new costume. (See below.) All that would have been "fixed" by Brodsky along with those Human Torch figures.
The extruded "4" design was eventually simplified to a more flat figure -- probably because Kirby simply forgot about the drop shadow effect somewhere around issue #16. He never rendered it consistently anyway. Had Joe Sinnott been on the book by this point, he may have added it back in for consistency, but the book still had a more-or-less rotating cast of inkers; Chic Stone is the first person to ink more than three consecutive issues starting with #29. The 3D effect on the "4" doesn't return consistently until John Byrne picked up the title many years later.

Tom Hanks first drew a lot of attention in the sitcom Bosom Buddies back in 1980 before making a very successful transition to movies with Ron Howard's directorial debut of Splash. Hanks has since had an incredible career with everything from the Academy Award winning Forest Gump to the now-three-decades-running franchise Toy Story. Some of his work has been more successful than others, of course, but even in something like Mazes and Monsters -- a made-for-TV movie which had an awful premise born out of the Satanic panic of the early 1980s -- Hanks turned in an excellent performance. But because of his long successful career, you don't need me to tell you who he is.

Not surprisingly, too, because he's been acting in such a high-profile capacity for so long, he's done more than a few interviews over the years promoting his various works. I certainly can't claim to have seen/heard all of them but, like I expect many of you, you've seen him on talk shows and heard him on podcasts and maybe even caught him speaking at a graduation ceremony or two. But in the decades of hearing him, I've never heard him mention comic books. Even when he was doing the circuits for Road to Perdition in 2002 and Here in 2024 both of which were based on graphic novels, I never heard him mention comics in any capacity.

Until I caught this interview from about a year ago, in which he describes the a-ha moment he had about how to handle his career in the wake of A League of their Own... It's only a three-minute clip in total but the comic reference goes by fast so I'll call it out. He says of this a-ha moment he had...

If you could go back now and shoot a movie about that, lightning would've flashed, the walls would've shook, and it sort of would've been like 'Black Bolt speaks!'

That's not a reference to the current Marvel Cinematic Universe. There's no great revelation about Black Bolt speaking in the shows or movies. That's a throwback to the original 1960s storyline when Black Bolt was a complete enigma. The character debuted in Fantastic Four #45 circa 1965 and little was offerred about him, other than the other Inhumans gave great deference to his power. However, a few issues later in #48, Black Bolt's brother Maximus traps the entire Inhuman civilaztion behind a Negative Barrier that no one cane break through. It became on ongoing subplot for the next year and change, and it was only destroyed in FF #59 when Black Bolt finally speaks. His voice is so powerful, it obliterates the barrier. Jack Kirby spent a page and a half showcasing all the destruction it caused, and Stan Lee used whatever space remained on the art board to fill with descriptions of how we were witnessing something "of such incalcuable power that it cannot possibly be described in merely human terms!"

This was a profound moment for fans. Dean Hill of Warrior, AL wrote in to say...

Words haven't been printed to describe F.F. #59! IThe story was like Shakespeare had written it! The artwork was like Michaelangelo had drawn it! Even the lettering was like Guttenburg had lettered it! In other words, this was a rather good mag! By the way, a certain question has been haunting me. When Black Bolt spoke (as so wonderfully shown on page 11, panel 5), what did he say?? Did he say "Sooie!"? Did he say "Four score and seven years ago..."? Or did Honest Irving slip him a few nickles (wooden, of course) to let the Inhumans hear Black Bolt say, "Make mine Marvel!"???

Doing some quick math, Hanks would've been about 11 when the issue came out. That is, the prime target demographic for those stories back in the day. That he would recall that story beat as such a pivotal and powerful moment -- casually and decades after the fact -- strongly suggests he was an avid reader at the time and was heavily invested in the story.

Tom Hanks, old school Fantastic Four fan. Who knew?