Possibly the single most impressive thing about Katy Doughty's How to Survive the End of the World is that she spends 256 pages talking about different ways the entire world either could or almost did end, and she manages to keep things cheerful and upbeat the entire time. I mean, even when Douglas Adams -- an iconically funny writer who had written for Monty Python -- wrote about the planet blowing up, he still had the sole survivor reflect, in a typically understated British fashion, "I'm a bit upset about that." Doughty doesn't even flinch that much.
The book is divided up into section based on the types of end of world scenarios. Plagues, climate collapse, AI/killer robots, etc. In each case, Doughty walks through how those scenarios would play out, often basing things on past precedent. The bubonic plague, the dinosaurs getting wiped out, and so on. (Obviously not so much past precedent on the killer robots, though.) She walks through both how each situations would arise, and what scientists have worked/are working on as possible counter measures. And rather than just saying, "hey, I did my own research on this; trust me," she brings in interviews she conducted with experts, letting them explain in their own words how things would play out. That's actually part of how she's able to remain positive throughout the book; scientists tend to be a hopeful lot, exploring possible solutions. And in some cases, they just pull out a mathematical reality check and say, "we actually calculated the odds of this happening and it's statistically zero."
Doughty doesn't just focus on the "immediate" issues either. She talks about the Earth getting swallowed by our sun as it eventually expands despite that being some 5 billion years in the future and even the eventual collapse of the entire universe that's so far in the future as to be functionally incalcuable. And despite even these certainties, Doughty takes the route of hope essentially saying that we should do the most with whatever time we do have.
What Doughty does exceptionally well throughout the book -- beyong just being positive -- is relaying a lot of fairly robust scientific information in exceptionally easy-to-understand language. It makes the book a surprisingly light read, despite the subject matter. It probably helps, too, that she uses a relatively cartoony style so that even the most horrific scenarios that she postulates on aren't rendered in a disturbing or grotesque fashion. Both of these things make the book incredibly approachable for virtually everyone.
If I had to offer a critcism, it would be in what she leaves out. She talks about ideas that people often consider extinction level events, and she makes note of how even in some of the worst case scenarios, they would not indeed be that devastating. What she doesn't really cover, though, is how awful and difficult it might be for those people who survive. She talks in terms of humanity writ large, and not people at an individual level. The bubonic plague didn't kill everyone, for example, but that's not much comfort for the people it did kill. Now, is it even possible to write a book that covers both the global and individual view of all these scenarios? Probably not. But Doughty does tend to gloss over that the individual level impacts that I think most people would prioritize in the midst of these scenarios. I mean, if killer robots do come for us, I think everyone's individual first priority is going to be, "how do I not get killed" over "how will humanity survive?"
But in a world where virtually every news headline screams about another way things are going to shit, and how doomsday is arond every corner, Doughty does a good job of keeping a check on the grand scheme of everything. There's a lot we don't have to worry ourselves with. And these days, I think every reason we have to move something into the "crap I don't have to fret over" column is worth taking advantange of; there's a lot of stuff we do need to worry about, so any opportunity to alleviate any of it is worth it.
How to Survive the End of the World actually came out a few months ago from Penguin Random House, so it should be readily available from your favorite bookseller. It retails for $19.99 US in paperback and $33.99 US in hardcover.
The book is divided up into section based on the types of end of world scenarios. Plagues, climate collapse, AI/killer robots, etc. In each case, Doughty walks through how those scenarios would play out, often basing things on past precedent. The bubonic plague, the dinosaurs getting wiped out, and so on. (Obviously not so much past precedent on the killer robots, though.) She walks through both how each situations would arise, and what scientists have worked/are working on as possible counter measures. And rather than just saying, "hey, I did my own research on this; trust me," she brings in interviews she conducted with experts, letting them explain in their own words how things would play out. That's actually part of how she's able to remain positive throughout the book; scientists tend to be a hopeful lot, exploring possible solutions. And in some cases, they just pull out a mathematical reality check and say, "we actually calculated the odds of this happening and it's statistically zero."
Doughty doesn't just focus on the "immediate" issues either. She talks about the Earth getting swallowed by our sun as it eventually expands despite that being some 5 billion years in the future and even the eventual collapse of the entire universe that's so far in the future as to be functionally incalcuable. And despite even these certainties, Doughty takes the route of hope essentially saying that we should do the most with whatever time we do have.
What Doughty does exceptionally well throughout the book -- beyong just being positive -- is relaying a lot of fairly robust scientific information in exceptionally easy-to-understand language. It makes the book a surprisingly light read, despite the subject matter. It probably helps, too, that she uses a relatively cartoony style so that even the most horrific scenarios that she postulates on aren't rendered in a disturbing or grotesque fashion. Both of these things make the book incredibly approachable for virtually everyone.
If I had to offer a critcism, it would be in what she leaves out. She talks about ideas that people often consider extinction level events, and she makes note of how even in some of the worst case scenarios, they would not indeed be that devastating. What she doesn't really cover, though, is how awful and difficult it might be for those people who survive. She talks in terms of humanity writ large, and not people at an individual level. The bubonic plague didn't kill everyone, for example, but that's not much comfort for the people it did kill. Now, is it even possible to write a book that covers both the global and individual view of all these scenarios? Probably not. But Doughty does tend to gloss over that the individual level impacts that I think most people would prioritize in the midst of these scenarios. I mean, if killer robots do come for us, I think everyone's individual first priority is going to be, "how do I not get killed" over "how will humanity survive?"
But in a world where virtually every news headline screams about another way things are going to shit, and how doomsday is arond every corner, Doughty does a good job of keeping a check on the grand scheme of everything. There's a lot we don't have to worry ourselves with. And these days, I think every reason we have to move something into the "crap I don't have to fret over" column is worth taking advantange of; there's a lot of stuff we do need to worry about, so any opportunity to alleviate any of it is worth it.
How to Survive the End of the World actually came out a few months ago from Penguin Random House, so it should be readily available from your favorite bookseller. It retails for $19.99 US in paperback and $33.99 US in hardcover.











