Anyway, I'm frequently scanning my bookshelves and long boxes for replacements as I read through things. I figure I've only read maybe a third of everything in my collection, so there's plenty to choose from. (I've been the recipient of multiple collections from others, so I've found my collection increase by thousands of issues literally overnight on at least four separate occasions!) But what strikes me is how often I'll spy a title that I don't immediately recognize and think, "This doesn't look familiar. I bet it's one of Dad's old books." But then when I pull it down and flip through it, I'll recall reading the story (although I won't always recall the story itself!) and remember that it's some book I picked up cheaply at a Half Price Books or something only a year earlier. Obviously, it wasn't a memorable story.
But I've also had instances where I come across some comic that I've had for forty years or more, but haven't looked at in at least thirty years, and yet I can remember curiously distinct details. Hell, I purchased a piece of original Kurt Schaffenberger art a few years ago because I remembered that particular page so vividly from my youth, despite it coming from a pretty lousy back-up story.
And yet, I couldn't tell you why I have a copy of Green Lantern: No Fear, what it might be about, or whether I've actually read it. But there it is, sitting on my shelf. (A subsequent search on my blog reveals that I bought it in a major discount bin back in 2007. Still no idea if I ever read it though.)
That doesn't mean that the stories I read as a kid were necessarily better -- just that several factors are different that predispose more recent reads to become more forgettable. To wit...
- When I was a kid, I had read far fewer books obviously. It's easier to store them in long-term memory if you don't have decades of other books in there as well.
- The earlier books got re-read more often. I had more time than money back then, and wound up re-reading books several times because I couldn't afford new ones. These days, I've got more books than I have time to read, so re-reading very rarely occurs.
- As a child, we tend to be more impressionable in general. So whatever we come across is more likely to leave a memorable impression than anything we see as adults.
- But, most significantly, I think, because I had read fewer books, many of the ideas presented in those early days seemed fresh, even if they weren't. "Why did the chicken cross the road?" isn't a funny joke to you because you've heard it a million times. But it could be hilarious to a five year old who's never heard it before!
My point is really just that we sometimes ascribe more power to works just because of when we encountered them, not because they were necessarily better or more original than what we see today.
0 comments:
Post a Comment