It has decidedly not gone unnoticed that all of these titles have lead characters that are women, POC, and/or fall under the LGBTQ umbrella. So are these cancellations REALLY based on sales numbers, as Marvel alleges? Let's take a look at November's numbers...
Iceman | 12,677 |
Luke Cage | 11,949 |
Gwenpool | 14,499 |
Generation X | 13,531 |
Hawkeye | 12,113 |
Captain Marvel | 15,037 |
Jean Grey | 16,997 |
Defenders | 23,133 |
America | 8,360 |
Well, those numbers aren't great, certainly. But of the books that don't seem to be cancelled yet, we also have the following (with their sales numbers)... | |
Black Bolt | 13,000 |
Unbeatable Squirrel Girl | 10,003 |
Monsters Unleashed | 7,406 |
Iron Fist | 17,371 |
Jessica Jones | 19,231 |
Moon Girl and Devil Dinosaur | 21,269 |
It's also easily noticeable that two of those non-cancelled titles I just listed feature female leads. So clearly, there's not a "let's just cancel everything with a woman in it" mentality going on. Moon Girl's lead is also Black, so a "let's just cancel everything with POC in it" attitude isn't happening either. (Although that Moon Girl is still north of 20,000 certainly helps it, I'm sure.)
I have to say, though, the really low numbers for Squirrel Girl and even more particularly Monster Unleashed give me pause. Gwenpool, Generation X, and Jean Grey are outselling Black Bolt -- now, again, sales numbers don't equate to profitability, but Jean Grey is selling a little more than twice Monsters Unleashed.
Of course, things are rarely made so simple and straight-forward. Just because an editor didn't come in and say, "To hell with all these women and minorities! Let's axe this shit!" doesn't mean that -isms didn't play a role here. It could've been much more subtle. Perhaps the profit numbers were really close, but they looked at the ones from female and minority led titles with a little more scrutiny. Or maybe they were convinced the books wouldn't sell from the start and didn't promote them as heavily as their clearly-more-popular titles, leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy.
I don't think we can look at these as a "pure" move to eliminate diversity in their titles. But it sure looks hella suspect, and it's definitely not a good PR move in an era when these types of decisions are analyzed in the public sphere ad nauseum.
0 comments:
Post a Comment