data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/782a3/782a37b77084c2c4cf27a0a7e87bcb52457530df" alt=""
At some point in the next couple of years, my father had begun buying comics here and there, and eventually picked up the four TMNT paperbacks that First Comics started putting out in 1986. By that point, I had more or less exhausted my own comic reading material, as well as my funds for obtaining any more, so I started reading Dad's comics. Including those TMNT books. So by the time the cartoon came around in late '87, I was pretty well-versed in the characters. I watched the cartoon, read all four TPBs my dad got, bought the action figures, got the role-playing game and played the arcade game.
And then I went off to college.
I don't think I've read, heard or watched a single Turtles story since then. They were just interesting enough for me to hold my attention at that time, but I think it was largely predicated off the momentum Eastman and Laird generated in their first dozen issues of the comic. So that's me coming to Eastman's Teenage Mutant Turtles Artobiography, which I won earlier this year.
The book is a history of Eastman's creative work on the Turtles. There is LOADS of artwork. Lots of sketches, pencil layouts, pre- and post-toned comic pages, paintings... the works. Much of it is annotated with notes about what this piece was used for, and how that piece was developed. There's also something of an introduction that explains how Eastman and Laird got started, and a bit about their work process for those early issues.
The book focuses mostly Eastman and Laird's collaborative efforts. There's a few pieces about Eastman's solo stories, and almost nothing regarding the cartoon or the movies or the action figures. I think a passing mention or two of each, but that's about it. The book is really about Kevin Eastman's Turtles.
With that in mind, it's an interesting look at Eastman's early development as a comic book artist. There's a very clear progression in his methodology and technique. (The book is arranged chronologically, so this the progression is easily apparent.) Eastman makes note, from time to time, too, of changes in style or direction.
As I said, there's tons of art and much of it is annotated. If I had a complaint about the book, though, is that it's JUST annotated. There's not a lot of substantive text. Eastman does a sufficient enough job of explaining what we're looking at, but I would certainly be interested in hearing more. But if you want to study Eastman's art in detail, I can't imagine a better tome.
1 comments:
Ah, the ninja turtles.
Talk about an interesting progression, when I think on my own association.
I guess I must have started with the 1990s cartoon series, which I loved. Then along came toys. At some point I started collecting the Archie Turtles comic, based on the cartoon. (Although, sort of like Marvel's Transformers comic it pretty quickly went its own way, and ended up with a lot of weird, inventive little stories and concepts.)
At some point I got hold of the four squarebound paperbacks of the original Eastman/Laird stories, which were of course quite different but enjoyable all the same.
And then eventually the Turtles were just "over," and in one or other of my collection purges, pretty much everything went.
Probably a bit of an overreaction, at least somewhat driven by an idea that ninja turtles were "for kids" (while, obviously, Spider-Man or the X-Men were mature works of literature), but ah well.
Of course, something like the ninja turtles cannot be vanquished so completely. I have precisely one TMNT comic book, now; the reprint of the black and white original story which was a Free Comic Book Day item a year or two back. But I still have the first two Turtles game cartridges for the NES. :-) (And somewhere at my mom's house there's probably a box of ninja turtle figures, too.)
What a fun stroll down memory lane.
Post a Comment