Anyway, I first heard about Achewood a few years ago. It's often thrown out there if you're looking for quick and easy examples of popular/successful web comics. So I swang by and read a strip. Not very good, I thought, but maybe creator Chris Onstad was having an off day. So I read another strip. And another. And another. And I decided that Onstad wasn't having an off day; I just didn't like the strip. But, hey -- different strokes for different folks, right?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f063/8f0630862b0def0994f5af8e4fb488d910c40da6" alt=""
It's not that I don't get what Onstad's trying to do. I can see the bits that supposed to come across as funny/amusing, and how they're supposed to come across in a where-the-heck-did-that-come-from kind of way, but it just struck me as... predictable isn't really the right word, but nothing seemed really inspired or particularly clever to me. It seems to me kind of like an artificial originality that might be generated by a computer program... it's different, but in a decidedly linear way. Coupled with poorly drawn artwork, adequate (at best) storytelling, lousy font choices, and a nearly complete disregard for punctuation, I really can't find anything about the strip -- or the book -- to recommend.
And I don't mean that to disparage Onstad or anyone who likes Achewood. Clearly, what he's doing resonates with a certain audience, so more power to him for that. If you do like Achewood, I don't see any reason why you wouldn't be thrilled with this book. As much as I don't care for it myself, I can totally see how an Achewood fan would love it. As I said, it's printed well and does have many pages of extras in the same vein as the strip itself. But this really isn't my cup of tea.
0 comments:
Post a Comment